I read the New York Times online version almost everyday. I also read a lot of other online newspapers. Then I read many of the blogs on my blogroll and many of the blogs on their blogrolls. I get opinions about the various New York Times news articles and opinions about the opinions of the various columnists that are featured in the New York Times online version. To be honest with you, I prefer the Washington Post and Insight mag.
I also read the LA Times and XRLQ's critiques of the rag, along with the rest of the Bear Flag League.
Up in Seattle The Shark has got me reading the Seattle Post-Intelligencer just so I can follow his legitimate gripes about its ridiculous bias.
I read the opinions of the people who are conservative, liberal, centrist, libertarian, socialist, and many of the loonies populating the whole political spectrum. I consider myself a liberal and somewhat libertarian.
At first I thought maybe I should comment more on what the New York Times and some of the other influential or not so influential newspapers publish. But when I read my blogs I can get twenty different opinions from twenty different bloggers about the good or bad when it comes to the New York Times or some of the other publications. There's really no need for me to add my voice to so much political punditry, rhetoric, opining, and outrageous blogging so I'll just.....I'll just.....Hell, I'll just join in the fun. If Howard Dean ever gets the Democratic nomination, is he going to quit saying the most ridiculous crap and become normal???!!!
Posted by John at December 31, 2003 04:53 PMNOTE: I've got better things to do than erase the childish, immature, psychotic, obscene comments from looney Roger Weidner and his gang of illiterate morons, so just put your opinions at the Johnhays.net Forum.