I agree. The silliest, most Marxist views on the planet are often parroted the most in the various humanities departments in the various institutions of higher learning. It's also my opinion that the least amount of actual scholarship occurs in the humanities departments.
In this post it is also brought up that the majority of successful 3rd world coup attempts are launched from inside the air force.
I think many of the points brought up in this post are probably true.
Cato the Youngest: The Myth of Chinese Air Power
It looks like we have a newspaper that is rewriting the constitution. It would seem to me (and I'm not a lawyer) that if you can get enough politicians in Washington, DC and the President of the U.S. to agree to go to war for any reason, it would be constitutional.
damnum absque injuria: Clear and Present Prevarication
I'm just not quite sure what to think about this story. Link via How Appealing who got it from http://www.obscurestore.com/.
Kansas City Star | 06/12/2003 | Fake cop busted when he tries to stop a real one
I'm probably the only blogger out there who has been sentenced to death in absentia by a white supremacist "common law court".
More lunacy from crazy, racist Roger Weidner and his followers. This time they have a crazy plan to assassinate government workers. One of the craziest is Jim Bell, author of "Assassination Politics".
They commit all sorts of crimes and get away with it. Many of the crimes they commit are violent. They even have a Praetorian Guard that protects them while they are committing their crimes.
These idiots join email lists they know I'm on and then send private emails to the list members falsely accusing me of all sorts of evil stuff. They also send slanderous emails to anybody I link to. Sort of reminds me of "internet terrorism" at its sleaziest.
There seems to be a lot of white supremacist sympathizers in the neighborhood around where I live.
Jim Bell is the author of Assassination Politics, a lonely cry for help in a world gone mad. Bell's plan is where people bet on the date of the death of a public official, giving assassins a motive to make the kill.Bell sat on the King's Bench, presided over by Chief Justice Charles Stewart of the Multnomah County Common Law Court (MCCLC), with such luminaries of the common law as Roger Weidner, the deputy district attorney for fraud, the man who discovered it in the system and went mad, forcibly interred at the state hospital for the insane by Judge Dorothy Baker, of the Multnomah County District Court, who, 13 years ago was in the same office Bell is suspected of bombing.
And on the other side of Bell, on the King's bench, sits Lunch, Dick Lancial, who the editor met in the back of a donut shop, magnificent guy, clerk for the MCCLC, charged with simulating court process, rousted from bed in his underwear and his computer seized by Portland city police the same moments the Feds were kicking in the door of Bell's elderly parents in their sweet Vancouver, Washington home to seize his computer.
A document found on Bell's computer reportedly bragged about bombing the
editor's office 13 years ago.Twelve angry men. Some quiet, reserved, others open and talkative. Some
with grievances. Some with quieter agendas.All of them white men. Calvinist Jeff Weakly, pastor for the court, who
the editor met in a bookshop, standing behind a counter expounding on the
true lost tribes of Israel.
After I divorced the psycho ex-wife, Faye Marie Oekerman, in 1980, her divorce lawyer (Roger Weidner), Victor Oekerman and some other psychos had a "common law court" and found me guilty of homosexuality, Satanism, pedophilia, the practice of Black Magic, and some other nonsense and sentenced me to death in absentia.
Of course, the particular "common law court" that found me guilty in absentia never notified me of the super secret proceedings because the people involved were and are cowards, liars, thieves, bigots, dangerously mentally insane, and just plain morons.
Over the years, since 1980, this group of morons have tried to carry out the sentence. They've even bribed people (including bribing women to become my friend and then lover) to carry out the sentence.
Click here for more info on common law courts.
The following is more information about "common law courts".
Common Law Courts
(Information about Northwest militia-type groups)
By Amy Minervini
University of Idaho journalism student
Vigilante justice is not just a pastime of cowboys in the Old West. Modern-day patriots are using their own court systems to threaten, harass, and even murder their opponents.
Militia members in more than 30 states use these alternative courts to further their itineraries. Common law courts, also known as citizen grand juries, operate outside of the judicial court system. They are self-elected members of a community who serve as officers, jurors and court clerks.
The committee hears cases and uses the court to propel paper attacks on local and federal officials.
"When these sovereign citizens bring a charge, the court claims power of investigation and calls accused parties to appear," said Devin Burghart and Robert Crawford, investigative journalists on militias.
"If they refuse, the court generally finds them guilty in absentia and issues punishment liens and threats of arrest, jailing or death to be enforced by the militia or constable."
According to their article "Vigilante Justice: Common Law Courts" in the Covert Action Quarterly, common law courts have issued numerous death threats to judges and jurors in the Northwest.
The Montana Freeman have been instrumental in developing this court system. "In the year that the Freeman remained fugitives, they became an inspiration to common law court groups nationwide," the writers stated.
In Southwest Oregon, a recent scuffle erupted between a civilian and a deputy sheriff. The civilian, Ted Davis, was shot and killed in the shoot-out, and friends of the deceased formed a militia in Davis' memory. "The Ted Davis Brigade would monitor the activities of the police, as in a civilian review board and serve as a kind of well-armed neighborhood watch," said a spokesman for the Brigade. "We don't expect any help from anyone except ourselves to solve and resolve law enforcement problems in Curry [County]. We want security and our rights. One comes with the other."
According to research by Burghart and Crawford, common law courts are deep-seated in the white supremacist movement. Their article shows some common law activists as having bigoted and racist agendas. "These courts are, at their core, a tool for furthering the supremacists struggle to construct a white, Christian republic on US soil. They weave conspiracy theories that scapegoat Jews and promote racist notions of citizenship."
Instead of common law courts and militias being antigovernment organizations, these journalists believe their primary goal is "replacing existing governing institutions with their own."
This same idea is echoed by Western States Center Researcher Jonn Lunsford who has noticed the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing resulted in militias in Oregon going underground. "Militias have metamorphosed into common law courts. You can think of the militia as the Department of Defense and the common law courts being the judicial system," said Lunsford. "The militia enforce the decisions of the common law courts."
The common law courts use liens, or stake legal claims, on local and federal public officials. The liens are issues of punishment and may even come in the form of death threats. According to Burghart and Crawford, activists in California face felony charges for veiled death threats to judges and jurors. Also, judges and prosecutors in Idaho and Montana have been issued arrest warrants by these courts.
With militia groups in the wary public eye, vigilante justice seems to have gotten the attention of lay and law enforcement alike. They call themselves Patriots, but will their system prevail? And if not, who will bring them down? These are questions only patience and awareness can answer.
Some of my relatives, John McClelland Hays, Neta Hays, and Chris Andrea Hays and some members of their church thought the white supremacist movement was so cool they decided to join...secretly, of course. How low can you get?
There's more of this nonsense.
EX MULTNOMAH COUNTY PROSECUTOR CLAIMS WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION
from the Oregon Observer, Nov. 1994 (re-published with permission)The Oregon Observer is printing this story as presented by
Roger Weidner, an ex-prosecutor with the Multnomah County District
Attorney's office.Investigators with the Oregon Observer have searched for denials
from the principals in this case to no avail. We would urge any of
the parties involved to come forward with any evidence that disputes
the validity of the claims in this story.As a hard-hitting investigative newspaper, the Oregon Ob-
server wishes to expose the truth, unconver the facts, and present
them to the People of the entire State of Oregon. It is with this
mission in mind that this story appears in our pages.To lend some credibility to the claims which Roger Weidner has
made in many courts, on the record, we add the following quote
from Martha Hicks, a prominent attorney at the offices of the
Oregon State Bar:"I am prosecuting Milton Brown and have been for quite some time."
This quote was made to investigative reporter Ed Snook with
the Oregon Observer from her office on October 25, 1994.CLAIMS OF CORRUPTION ON A GRAND SCALE
Exposed in the Oregon Supreme Court by Roger Weidner, Governor Barbara
Roberts, Attorney General Ted Kulongowski, Multnomah County District
Attorney Micheal Schrunk and other Federal, State and local officials
subpoenaed to appear before a special Grand Jury convened by Roger
Weidner on October 14, 1994 to inquire into the cirminal conduct of
attorneys and judges covering up the alleged murder of attorney Don
Kettleberg by his business partner, attorney Milton Brown and Dr.
Charles Hahn, and the conversion by Brown and Hahn of $35 million in
Kettleberg estate assets. None of the above appeared before the Grand
Jury.Roger Weidner, an attorney on inactive status with the Oregon
State Bar and while serving on jury duty in Multnomah County on
October 14, 1994, subpoenaed not only the public officials
mentioned above but also the following:
* All justices of the Oregon Supreme Court
* All Judges of the Oregon Court of Appeals
* The entire Oregon congressional delegation
* Portland Mayor Vera Katz
* City Attorney Jeff Rogers
* All City Commissioners
* Clackamas County Commissioners and Counsel
* Mr. Teitsworth with the FBI
* Caroline Leonard, Director of the local IRS office
* Ray Taylor with the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS
* Robert Skipper, Multnomah County Sheriff
* James O'Leary, Clackamas County District Attorney
* Charles Moose, Portland Police ChiefThey were all to appear to show cause why Roger Weidner,
as a member of the Multnomah County Juror Panel, should not
convene a special Grand Jury to investigate the alleged ongoing
criminal conduct of attorneys and judges in Multnomah
and Clackamas County Oregon.The ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and the SUBPOENA sent to those public
officials appears at the end of this article.Weidner appeared before the Oregon Supreme Court with 40
of his supporters including Dal Ferry, editorial writer with the
Oregon Observer.The attentive and courteous Justices sat in stunned silence as
an animated Weidner described in detail his allegations that:1. Portland Attorney Milton Brown and Dr. Charles Hahn
murdered their business partner Don Kettleberg by writing "do
not resuscitate" on his hospital records to cause his death before
Janette Kent, Kettleberg's fiancee, returned to Portland.
Weidner contends it was necessary Kettleberg be dead when Kent returned
so Brown and Hahn could execute their forged buy-sell agreements.2. How Brown placed his secretary Caroline Brune in as personal
representative of the Kettleberg estate while she was still on
Brown's payroll and had her prepare an estate inventory
showing the $21 million estate assets worth only $1.6 million.3. How Brown and Hahn, with the aid of Brune and her
attorney Michael Gentry, through a series of sham transactions.4. How Weidner has been repeatedly ordered arrested in the
presence of 40-50 supporters, when he has appeared in the
courts of Judges Lee Johnson, Don Londer, Philip Abraham,
James Ellis, Joseph Ceniceros, Gregory Milner and Steven
Mauer to make a record of the scandalous criminal conduct of
attorneys and judges in stealing all the Kettleberg estate assets
and $1.5 million in preperty belonging to New World Ministries.5. How Weidner was violently arrested on orders of
Judge Philip Abraham when he attempted to appear in
Multnomah County Presiding Court and make a record of the
fact that he had been subpoenaed into that court by Milton
Brown and believed that a trap was being set to take his life.6. How Weidner has been arrested 6 times in Multnomah
County Circuit Courts and 3 times in Clackamas County Circuit
Courts and incarcerated a total of 112 days on the orders
of Judges Lee Johnson, Donald Londer, James Ellis, Phillip
Abraham, Joseph Ceniceros, Steven Mauer and Gregory
Milnes when he has attempted to appear in their court and
make a record of their criminal behavior in aiding and abetting
attorneys Brown, Schmit and others in looting the Kettleberg
estate and New Wine Ministries.7. How real estate salesman Linn Springer with the aid of
Lake Oswego attorney Ken Schmit and Kathy and George
Mason enticed pastors Helen and Chet Jones to purchase a
farm in Beavercreek, Oregon on which the debt exceeded the
value of the property.8. How Clackamas County Judge Alan Jack ordered the
pastors off the property after they had made over $200 thousand
dollars in improvements.9. How Clackamas County Sheriff Sergeant Terrence
Schaeffer ordered the pastors off the property at gun point and
refused to allow them to remove over $1 million in store fixtures
and inventory stored on the property. How all property
belonging to New Wine Ministries, valued in excess of $1.5 million,
was looted by Kathy Mason, Ken Schmit and others.10. How Don Calkins, former husband of Kathy Mason and
the true owner of the property, sold his interest in the property
to Weidner in an attempt to block Schmit and others' attempt
to steal the property.11. How Weidner was arrested by Sgt. Schaeffer when
he walked on the property, was tried and convicted of criminal
trespass by Judge Mauer and sentenced to 10 days in jail and
two years of probation.12. How Weidner was forcibly arrested in front of 40 supporters
by Captain Sherwood Stillman and 6 armed deputies when he attempted
to appear before Judge Gregory Milnes to set aside the order
dismissing the complaint he had filed against Judges Alan Jack,
Patrick Gilroy, Sid Brockley, John Lowe, and Ken Schmit, Linn
Springer, Kathy Mason, George Mason, Capt. Stillman, Sgt.
Schaeffer, Clackamas County counsel Miles Ward and Martha
Hicks with the Oregon State Bar for racketeering.13. How Captain Stillman locked the courtroom doors and
shuttered the windows on the doors to seal Weidner and his
supporters in the courtroom prior to forcibly arresting
Weidner.Jane Angus was prosecuting Weidner for the Oregon State
Bar. During her 5 minute presentation tot he court, she did
not refute the truthfulness of the charges being leveled against the
attorneys and Judges named above. Nor did any of the Justices
hearing the charges question Weidner about the charges
he was making."It is simply intolerable that this condition in our courts and
government be allowed to continue," states Weidner. "As the
state director of the Constitutional Defenders I am asking that each person
reading this paper make it available to at least one other person.
I am also asking that each person reading this paper make a
demand on Senators Hatfield and Packwood, as well as the newly
elected members of the U.S. House of Representatives from
Oregon to compel a congressional investigation of this massive
corruption in our courts."Our children and posterity will surely and rightfully condemn
each of us if we let it be said, that we were born free but
because of our apathy, timidity or indifference we let our Rights
protected by the Bill of Rights, that our fore-fathers fought so
hard to secure, to be taken from us without a fight.We must all act immediately to restore adherence to the state
and U.S. Constitutions!The Oregon Observer
15033 SE McLoughlin, Box 312
Milwaukie OR 97267-2800
(503) 786-3849
And there's more
PORTLAND - In a ninety minute stand off, Oregon activist Lon Mabon and his wife Bonnie confronted Multnomah County "judge" RONALD CINNIGER about the fact that Cinniger has not sworn the same oath as mandated in the Oregon Constitution in order to be a lawful judge or to proceed
against Mabons.
An overflow crowd of supporters were kept in the hallway, as a packed
courtroom watched Cinniger and Mabons discuss the challenges before the
court. The following is from personal notes taken at the trial today.
The thirteen or more media representatives were seated in the jury box
in the crowded courtroom. In the crowd were Lons father Myron Mabon,
supporters Lou Beres, with the Oregon Christian Coalition; Bob
Eckstrom, director of the Constitution Party of Oregon; Paul DeParrie,
long time advocate and Right to Life spokesman; Milt Mitcheck,
Constitutional Researcher and Court Advocate; William Mayhar,
Constitutional Scholar and advocate; Roger Weidner, Republican Governor
candidate, Republican Party; Jesse Lott, political advocate and
courtwatcher; Michael Marsh, Salem TV producer; Yvonne Heinrichs,
peoples rights advocate, and many more.
Upon entering the courtroom, Cinniger ordered that all beepers be shut
down and that if anyone spoke in the courtroom besides the parties they
would be removed. Cinniger announced the case, "Stauffer v OCA, Scott
Lively, OCA Educational Foundation, and OCA, Inc. Plaintiff CATHERINE
STAUFFER and representative BRENT FOSTER were present at the table, and
Cinniger acknowledged that Lon and Bonnie Mabon were present for the
Record.
Mabons stayed behind the bar in the court, appearing by "special
appearance" Sui Juris, retaining their own Rights and without
representation and told the court on the Record that they were
challenging the jurisdiction of the court, and did not want to enter
into a false or fictitious jurisdiction. Lon tried to speak but
Cinninger talked over him. Lon stated that he expected the judge to
uphold his rights in the courtroom, and Cinniger told Mabons that they
would not be recognized unless they came into the bar.
Bonnie Mabon stated that they were insisting on a court that
"guarantees my rights", and was ignored by Cinniger.
Attorney Foster stated that they had been trying to collect a judgement
for nine years, that on November 14 there had been a judgement debtor
hearing, and again on November 26, and that Mabons did not appear in
either of those hearings. The attorney described how a judge Ellis had
ordered a December hearing for contempt for the failure to appear at
the previous hearing.
Foster stated that on the December 12 court date the case had been
moved to federal court ( and was remanded the same day!). The attorney
stated that the hearing was rescheduled for February 7, 2002, that
there had been an error in time and then was rescheduled for today.
Cinniger asked Lon and Bonnie repeatedly to cross the bar to "respond"
to the court, which Mabons refused to do. Cinniger had Governor
candidate Roger Weidner removed when Weidner tried to suggest to Mabon
to cross the bar and make the Record against the judge for violating
Mabons rights.
Lon Mabon again told the court that he would be glad to participate if
Cinniger would sign a simple contract that stated that Mabons rights
would be upheld in the courtroom and that Cinniger in fact was a lawful
judge. Cinniger replied "I TAKE IT YOU WILL NOT PARTICIPATE", ignoring
Mabons responses.
Cinniger turned to attorney Foster, and stated "they have challenged
the jurisdiction of the court. What is your response to this?" The
attorney stated "we think they are frivolous, this has been ruled on by
you...."; Cinniger interrupted the attorney and said " NO I HAVE NOT
RULED ON THIS OATH CHALLENGE. I ASKED YOU TO RESPOND WHY THE NAMED
DEFENDANTS SHOULD BE HELD IN CONTEMPT - THEY HAVE CHALLENGED THE
JURISDICTION".
Attorney Foster stated "that the court has ample jurisdiction under
Oregon Revised Statutes 33.015, 33.025, to issue contempt is clear".
The attorney stated "the challenge to the oath is not an issue that has
merit".
Mabon stated "your intent to uphold my rights faithfully and
impartially". Mabon asked again "did you take an oath?" Cinniger kept
ignoring Mabon.
Cinniger asked the bar representative "are you aware that the oath is
missing some words?" The attorney said "the court feels the oath is
appropriate. Cinniger said "it is appropriate for a litigant to
challenge the jurisdiction or authority of an individual acting as a
judge.... I think it is NOT frivolous.... it IS an issue. Comparing the
oaths, I found another way to look at it."
Mabon kept trying to say CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CINNIGER, CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW !!!, but Cinniger kept ignoring Mabons accurate responses.
Cinniger said "if it even applies".
Mabon said "Taswell v Smith states ALL circuit judges MUST take the
original Constitutional oath. Cinniger stated that he had decided that
the false oath was OK, and told the bar representative "I believe Ms
Stauffer that the challenge is to be denied", and continued to proceed
against Mabons, refusing to allow any redress on the merits or the
lawfulness of his acts.
Lon Mabon said "twelve different times we have challenged this
jurisdiction. As you even stated, a legitimate challenge. Mabon said
"the court has to appreciate our reluctance to proceed without a
contract. I want you to sign my contract before these people and the
press".
Again Cinniger said "I take that to be you refuse to cooperate".
Cinniger said "the law provides for a way for disputes to be resolved"
..... "when a decision is made" ......(Lon said "IF THEY ARE A
QUALIFIED JUDGE" WITH A CONSTITUTIONAL OATH") Cinniger continued
"requires the representatives to come to court (Lon stated "WHEN YOU
ARE UNDER OATH I WILL")...
Cinniger said that the court has the power of contempt to force people
to "remedy the situation" (even though civil judgements are not
jailable offenses and jail cannot be a penalty in a civil case !)
Cinniger stated "in this case the Plaintiff is asking the court to hold
two citizens in contempt as directors of the corporation to apear at a
judgement debtor hearing. The Corporation could have appeared by other
persons. Plaintiff has made a showing that the corporate entitities and
two individuals did not appear. A remedy includes confinement. Before
we get to that, this hearing is to show why they should not be held in
contempt. Plaintiff's attorneys have asked for jail as punishment or to
induce payment to comply - until Mabons agree to participate or up to 6
months."
Cinnniger then told Mabons about their right to an attorney since they
were "unrepresented". Mabons are Sui Juris before the court and do not
waiver their rights over to any bar member "representative", but claim
their Inherent rights, demanding a constitutional court.
Lon stated "MY RIGHTS ARE NOT GUARANTEED IN THIS COURT".
Cinniger asked attorney Foster "what remedy is the Plaintiff seeking?
Foster replied "all is designed to encourage and require Mabons to pay
the judgement. We are seeking confinement until they submit to a
judgement debtor hearing. $500.00 $$ a day sanctions against each of
them, as well in the courts power. Lon as director, Bonnie as
Secretary/Treasurer, control both of the (corporate) entities. They are
high managerial agents. ORS 33.025 (3), 33.025 (d). They have failed to
recognize the jurisdiction of the court. Hold them jointly and
severally liable for attorney fees and time specific order to pay - we
have no belief they intend to pay. Original judgement 30,000, now with
interest and attorneys fees federal and state, more than $40,000.00."
Attorney Foster continued "We want a $500.00 sanction on every pleading
or motion filed by Mabons and found to be frivolous. We want the court
to strike all future motions and to strike all answers filed and that
are frivolous in this case".
Lon spoke "you are acting under an amended Article VII, NOT the lawful
constitutional Article VII, original, the lawful jurisdiction I have
claimed".
Cinniger stated "there are two kinds of persons. Here today we have a
Plaintiff, two citizens, corporate entity, and the citizens not created
by law, but as individuals. It is appropriate for the court to consider
when the corporate citizen is created, the offices have responsibility
to the corporation. Like you can't create children without
responsibility to them. A fiduciary interest. Corporate interest is
inconsistent to individual interest. A citizen who represents a
corporate body has a responsbility."
Bonnie Mabon stated "How can you say the issues are an issue but not in
this court' .... but I ruled against it' ...I don't think the issues
are frivolous." Mabon stated "if they have merit don't you have to
abide by your oath?"
An unidentified attorney appeared before the court Amicus Curiae, and
asked for time to brief the case. Cinniger denied the attorney request,
saying it was "untimely".
Cinniger proceeded to state that he found Mabons to be in contempt
"beyond a reasonable doubt", that they had not appeared nor had the
corporate entities appeared. Attorney Foster reminded Cinniger that the
Mabons "willfully" refused to comply, and Cinniger used the word
"willfully" in his finding.
Cinniger stated that he did not believe that Mabons would comply with a
disposition (compelled contract and admission of guilt), and so ordered
Mabons to jail, Lon immediately from the courtroom, Bonnie ten days
from now (March 1, 2002). Cinniger ordered the sanctions of $500.00 a
day each, on one corporate name until the amount of the original debt
is paid. Then Cinniger stated that on the second corporate name the
sanctions would be in place until double the original amount was paid.
Mabon told Cinniger that that particular corporate entity had been
closed for ten years. It was unclear to observers exactly whether
Cinniger changed that order or not. Cinniger told attorney Foster that
"all other sanctions I am denying," except attorney fees.
Cinniger stated "I find no alternative Mrs Mabon, also in contempt, and
impose six month sentence in jail, suspended for ten days.
The front row of the courtroom was cleared and Lon Mabon was led from
the courtroom in handcuffs before a crowded roomfull of angry
courtwatchers.
As Cinniger was moving to arrest Lon in the courtroom, courtwatcher
William Mayhar rose and left the room, stating loudly on the Record to
the court "I am not going to sit here and watch any more of this
treason" and left the room.
As Mayhar left, the judge ordered the sheriffs to remove Milt Mitcheck,
researcher and advocate, who affirmed that the judge had no oath to
proceed, and had stated so.
After Mitcheck was "escorted" out, Wilbur Gaston, founder of A Voice
For Children, rose and on the Record to the judge stated "I charge YOU
with treason and misprison of felony" for your acts.* Gaston was
assaulted in the hallway by Sheriffs McHenny and Greathouse, as he was
leaving, who told Gaston he had to leave the building and was being
"evicted". The sheriffs attempted to force Gaston to allow his picture
to be taken, yet said he was "not" arrested. Gaston told the sheriffs
in no uncertain terms that if they were going to take his picture they
were going to arrest him or he was leaving now. And Gaston left without
the Sheriffs following on their threats.
Courtwatchers reported that the sheriffs were confronted after Gaston
charged the judge, to arrest Cinniger. The courtwatchers asked the
Sheriffs how they were protecting a man who refused to take his lawful
oath, and that the sheriffs had just seen this confirmed for
themselves. The Sheriffs told the courtwatchers that they were unsure
what to do and said possibly after the hearing they would be arresting
Cinniger. (The paperwork to arrest Cinniger had been served on Sheriff
Dan Noelle by process server yesterday to arrest Cinniger for treason;
additional paperwork moving for prosecution and sanctions is being
filed at this time.)
In the courtroom, after Mabon was led away, courtwatchers told the
press DID YOU SEE THAT THE JUDGE REFUSED TO TAKE HIS OATH? YOU SAW IT
FOR YOURSELF NOW - THIS IS TREASON AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS AT ALL."
The sheriff directing the courtroom security said "pretty soon what you
are doing will be criminal" When asked who was "we" and what he meant,
he replied "your common law courts". The courtwatchers assured him that
when he is on trial for committing unlawfull acts against the citizens,
and that it is NOT "just doing my job", and accountability is reached,
and SOMEONE HAS TO ANSWER, then he will enjoy the same kind of court, a
rendering, where he will have no rights and no lawful judge and no
court will go to the lawfulness of the court, the bar member judges and
attorneys or the violations of lawful process.
The courtwatchers assured the sheriffs that their families are as
vulnerable as the rest of the "people" to these rights violations,
fraud, extortion and racketeering being openly operated now in Oregon.
The STATE OF OREGON corporate entity, bar representative had no defense
today in court on the Record that the judges in Oregon have NO OATH -
NO BOND - NO CONTRACT with the constitutionally sovereign Oregonians.
NO AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER.
When Cinniger told Attorney Foster "I want you to respond to this" in
court that means RESPONSE ..... as in - GIVE ME THE SUPPORTING
ARGUMENTS FOR THIS NOW TO DEFEND MYSELF WHILE I AM HANGING OUT HERE AND
EVERYONE KNOWS THE OATH I AM UNDER IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL.
AND, JUST AS IN THE SENATE HEARINGS LAST YEAR ON THE FRAUD OF THE
AMENDED VII COURTS, THE COURT/BAR/STATE HAD NO DEFENSE. The attorney
and Cinniger discussed that this issue DOES have merit, IS important,
is NOT FRIVOLOUS, and did not allow the "vexatious litigant" filing
against Mabons to stop them from ever defending themselves again in any
court in America, federally and state.
The false oath issue has been openly reported and admitted by Oregon
Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace Carson, new information at this
time revealing more knowlege of the false oaths and that the courts
have known for twenty years that they were taking color of law "oaths",
not binding to the constitutional rights of the sovereign people. That
is how they violate every Inherent Right provided in the Bill of
Rights, and as in todays hearing, the attorney said they were
"upholding the law" and making the Mabons "follow the law".
The truth is, as is so clearly revealed in this case and in our own,
that the legislature are the perpetrators of the extreme process
violations in the non constitutional courts. This is the justice 2020,
the new rules where the bar members are ALLOWED to conduct malicious
prosecutions and lie, cheat and steal (just passed last month !) But
you go to jail. Like Lon and Bonnie. And Will and I next week, next
Thursday, if the STATE has its way with us again (sixth sham jury trial
in more than five years now !!!)
So everyone sees the REAL PICTURE is they willl NOT go to the
lawfulness of what they are doing.... it is always "that has been heard
before, we are not going to talk about what happened before, and deny
all evidence of injury or state liability. They are creating a class
immune from prosecution, are doing this NOW, where these pervert
profiteers are exploiting the people and our children by force, and NO
ONE WILL ANSWER. The governor has been subpoaened to our trial, and
once again will not appear, even though he IS the "STATE" of Oregon
face.
There is no human so far who is accountable. The feds are moving in
Oregon now and no one is stopping them. The prostitutes to the
corporate state act in the interest of the corporate state.
You heard it yourself in this article Cinniger trying to compare a
corporation to having a child, and fiduciary interest. They are NOT
acting in your "interest" and "interest" only means how much money they
make. Enron is a "department" of this fraud, the whole government is
the "criminal enterprise for profit", the banks, title companies
insurance, etc are all the same money going aroung and around (or
illusion of money !) OPERATING THROUGH THE COURTS WHO ARE PROTECTING
THE FRAUD......
SYSTEMIC colluding and conducting FRAUD against the people no level of
law or court at any level .... the federal takeover and global agenda
..... in Oregon the Pioneer police State...... Enron broke open in
Oregon after being exposed in the Western Electric grab, stealing the
Klamath property, among other exploitations..... watch Capitol
Investments in Oregon next and in Washington and New York.... they are
liquidating all their assets now, our children, our homes, our
lives..... we are slaves in their new non constitutional world .....
only "sustainable" according to what we "contribute" to the "system",
in the "interest"/money for the corporate socialist state.
PANDORAS BOX HAS BEEN OPENED and the corruption is systemic. Mabons are
standing firm in the TRUTH, have never committed any crime against
anyone, and are even "charged" and in jail for an "unarrestable"
offence. We PRAY that people see how YOU ARE NEXT as this "outreach"
claw grasps our freedom - it already proceeds as though it owns our
children and property, and as Mabons are so clearly exemplifying, we
have at this time only TYRANNY and NO REDRESS at any level of court,
and in fact NO lawful court, outside of the sovereign court we held in
Marion County on June 20, 2001, a court of Law and credible evidence.
THIS IS SERIOUS FOLKS ..... EVERYONE BETTER PAY ATTENTION AND TELL EACH
OTHER WHAT IS GOING ON AND DO IT FAST ...... THE FEDS ARE MOVING AT
THIS TIME IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS AS WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THEM, THE
COLLUSION LIKE RABID DOGS, MULTI JUDICIAL SCHEMES AT EVERY LEVEL, COVER
UP AND FRAUD.
IT WILL ALL END WHEN WE CAN GET ONE ANSWER, PROSECUTION AND
ACCOUNTABILITY, AND COURTS WITH LAWFUL OATHS TO PROTECT US.
THESE SAME UNLAWFUL OATHS APPLY TO LEGISLATORS, WHOSE OATHS ARE
NOTARIZED BY OTHER FALSE OATH JUDGES, AND GOVERNOR KITZHABER SIGNED HIS
FALSE OATH ON THE TALMUD, THE ANCIENT BABYLONIAN SLAVE CHATTEL CODE,
NOW CALLED THE U.C.C., THE "BIBLE" OF THE CULT OF THE NEW CORPORATE
SOCIALIST STATE, WITH WHOM WE HAVE SLAVE STATUS AS "US CITIZENS" WHICH
WE ARE NOT. WE ARE SOVEREIGN STATE CITIZENS IN A REPUBLIC, NOT A
DEMOCRACY. GUARANTEED THESE RIGHTS UN A LIEN ABLE.
Mabons excercised their birthright, Inherent Constitutionally protected
Rights today in the courtroom. Tonight it is seen widely on the news
that the court did NOT ANSWER THE PEOPLE.
WE ASK - WOULD NOT A JUDGE OF INTEGRITY BE PROUD TO STAND AND SAY YES -
OF COURSE I HAVE TAKEN MY CONSTITUTIONAL OATH, AS I AM BONDED AND
SWORN", but in fact, they have been playing another game in there for a
long time. Chief Justice Wallace Carson told a group of courtwatchers
in private one day "yes - I am a public servant and proud of it", yet,
the courts recently taken "new" oaths are as big a fraud as
before.....still not the right words, not to say of all the VOID
decisions that have to be dealt with, and the people injured and in
jail who have committed no crime ..... like Mabons and ourselves and
you next........ NO judge is yet under the lawful oath in Oregon.
TIME FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN OREGON TODAY.
Pamela Gaston, A Voice For Children, Fifth Amendment Coalition
*(Gaston and the Citizens in Marion County arrested "judge" Fred Avera
on September 30, l999, for Treason and Misprison of Felony for the
criminal acts comitted by Avera and others against Gastons minor child.
She has been severally abused by the state and being held now more than
six years as a political prisoner while the courts protect each other
in blatant collusion. This ongoing retaliation is continuing next
Thursday, attack after attack for Gastons whistleblowing on black
market child and pornography being operated and protected in the Oregon
child services, as well as systemic fraud and racketeering. The
articles on this and the text are on our website
www.avoiceforchildren.com)
And there's still even more of this nonsense.